Nandi Lewis
POL 166
Professor: Barry Murdaco
Lehman College
Reflection Paper
Revisiting the Constitution:
We Need Term Limits for Federal Judges
By James Greene
Revisiting the Constitution:
We Need Term Limits for Federal Judges
By James Greene
“Eighteen years would mean that justice’s tenure would be
long enough to ensure independence from political patronage. As important, it
would be short enough to ensure that we remain a country of laws and not of men.”
(James Greene)
In this article
written by James Greene he expresses the concerns of power in the Supreme Court
systems. This particular part in the article states the main concern of which judicial
branch of the Constitution needs to be advised more often so that the same
person in power of this branch does not feel lead to exercise power according
to his beliefs because being there for a long period of time. He expresses how
it is patronage in a sense to allow the same person to stabilize laws because
he or she is able to affect decisions that need to be made hastily in order to
implement the needs of society. The judge would be able to affect legislative
and executive inputs on every change; and implement court orders in which to
enhance a certain population in the country. Having someone in the Supreme
Court seat for an ample amount of time does
allow U.S citizens to feel as if were are receiving the freedom that was
promised to us. More importantly it is important that laws benefit the population’s
best interest and not of those who are in control of meaningful decisions, decisions
that are based upon for example racial stereotypes. In conclusion having
certain amount of time for judges to work in Supreme Courts limits the over use
of power.
In picking this article I found it
interesting to learn that the Constitution allows for judges to sit for years
doing this job. If the executive and legislative have to meet certain time
requirements why is it that these judges are silently remaining in power for
long periods? This book that I am reading for one of my classes called “The New
Jim Crow” by Michelle Alexander, really informed me on things I did not know
especially about the Supreme Court. She stated that the Supreme Court were allowing
law enforcement to perform tactics by giving them consent to do unreasonable
searches and seizures when it came to drugs without no suspicion. They also did
not value the fourth amendment towards minorities in particular, and with the
police they came up with ways to justify certain actions. I think what Green
wrote as a step in making sure judges serve shorter times is a great idea
because in any case certain rules would not affect people for long periods of
time. Also it gives us in this country a chance to see who is true to serving
the country rather than serving themselves. Overall, this article opened my
understanding towards politics because it allowed me to see the constitution
for what it truly is.
No comments:
Post a Comment